2026 07 27 Digital Artist 0001¶
Slice
digital-artist/0001Β· Level 0001 (Web Fundamentals) Β· Apprentice tier Β· Engine verdict β fail (avg 63.5%) Β· Walked 2026-07-27π Perfection run Β· π Perfection dashboard Β· π Raw report Β· π Change history
π― Session Summary¶
I walked the first window (5 of 26 quests) of the Digital Artist (UI/UX) path at Level 0001 Β· Web Fundamentals (π± Apprentice) as a learner would, consuming the sealed execute-engine evidence and reading each quest source in plan order. The window mixes strong foundational front-end content with two hard blockers and one un-scored quest, so the slice fails as a continuous learning path today.
The two pure teaching quests β Advanced Markdown (92) and CSS Styling Basics (82) β are technically excellent and their snippets were verified against real engines. But the window also drops a learner into two quests that cannot be completed as written: Building & Testing the Git Init Shell Script (23) targets a scripts/git_init.sh that does not exist in the repo (I independently confirmed this on the host tree), and Technology Stack Analysis: Barodybroject (57) ships a broken Quick Setup whose DB_CHOICE=sqlite workaround is rejected by the live app. The Bootstrap Framework quest returned no verdict β the engine hit its 40-turn ceiling retrying CDN reachability checks in the network-restricted sandbox. A maintainer should treat the git-init and barodybroject issues as the actionable fixes for this window.
πΊοΈ The Journey¶
Plan order (deterministic, from walk-plan.json; verdicts from walk-evidence.json):
- β
Advanced Markdown: Tables, Footnotes & Kramdown β 92 Β·
main_questβ Every markdown/kramdown/Liquid example rendered exactly as claimed; only gap is the unqualified "task lists render as real checkboxes" claim (GFM-only). - β Technology Stack Analysis: Barodybroject β 57 Β·
side_questβ Self-aware, well-researched, but the hands-on Quick Setup is broken and several claims drift past what its disclaimer covers. - β
CSS Styling Basics: Selectors, the Box Model & Layout β 82 Β·
main_questβ All CSS snippets verified via headless Chromium; two real cascade bugs surface when you build the stylesheet in the order taught. - β Bootstrap Framework: Build Responsive Sites Fast β no score Β·
main_questβ Engine errored (max_turns) while probing the Bootstrap CDN; not evaluated, not a confirmed content defect. - β Building & Testing the Git Init Shell Script β 23 Β·
main_questβ Unrunnable: the single artifact every command targets (scripts/git_init.sh) is absent from the repository.
Engine headline: avg 63.5% Β· 2 pass Β· 0 warn Β· 3 fail (scored 4, errored 1).
π¬ Evidence¶
All command outcomes below come from the sealed walk-evidence.json execute pass (real commands run in the disposable sandbox). Static judgements are labelled reasoned.
1. Advanced Markdown β β 92 Β· ran 12/13 recorded (12 passed, 1 skipped) Β· 4 runnable snippets¶
passedΒ· 3-column aligned table β correct left/center/right in both python-markdown and the realkramdowngem (<th style="text-align: β¦">).passedΒ· Footnote[^speed]β superscript link + bottom<div class="footnotes">with back-link, matching the prose.passedΒ· Full frontmatter file + Liquid{β% for post in site.posts %β}verified against the real liquid gem.passedΒ· macOS / Windows / Linux setup blocks (mkdir/touch) all ran cleanly.- Dimensions: commands_work 5, content_accuracy 4, completeness 5, clarity 4, structure 5, safety 5.
2. Technology Stack Analysis: Barodybroject β β 57 Β· ran 6/23 recorded (5 passed, 1 failed, 6 reasoned, 11 skipped) Β· 8 runnable¶
failedΒ· Quick Setup bash block:git clone,venv,pip install -r src/requirements.txt, andmigratesucceeded, butexport DB_CHOICE=sqlite && python manage.py β¦is rejected by the livesettings.py, which hard-raises for non-Postgres. This is the documented "quick local run" path (body l.671-673) and it does not work.reasonedΒ·requirements.txtexcerpt (l.380-418) drifts: live Django is pinned 5.1.4, quest shows 4.2.20; the django-filer/django-cms family is absent from the live file.reasonedΒ· settings.py excerpts (l.205-236, l.650-658) reference undefinedenv/IS_PRODUCTIONβNameErrorif a learner runs them standalone.- Body l.538 / l.591 claim "None identified in current dependency scan" β the engine notes the quest's own recommended
pip-auditsurfaces real CVEs against the pinned versions, contradicting the text. - Dimensions: commands_work 2, content_accuracy 3, completeness 3, clarity 3, structure 2, safety 5.
3. CSS Styling Basics β β 82 Β· ran 12/15 recorded (12 passed, 2 reasoned, 1 skipped) Β· 4 runnable¶
passedΒ· Selector, box-model, flexbox, grid, custom-property, and theming snippets each verified via headless Chromium computed-style checks.reasonedΒ· macOSopen/ Windows PowerShellNew-Itemsetup blocks judged equivalent to the Linux block that actually ran (not executed on those OSes).- Two confirmed cascade bugs flagged (see Issues): Ch.3 mobile-first
.card-gridmedia queries silently override the Ch.2 auto-fit grid demo; the Theming:root { --brand }silently overrides Ch.3's--brand. - Dimensions: commands_work 4, content_accuracy 4, completeness 4, clarity 4, structure 4, safety 5.
4. Bootstrap Framework β β no verdict (engine max_turns)¶
- No
verdict_obj, no dimensions, no snippet record. The sealed error shows the engine looping oncurl -sI https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap@5.3.3/β¦and a generalcurl -sI https://www.google.comconnectivity probe until it hit the 40-turn cap. - Reasoned (static read of source): the quest loads Bootstrap purely via jsDelivr CDN (
<link β¦bootstrap@5.3.3β¦min.css>l.237,<script β¦bootstrap.bundle.min.js>l.252) and mentionsnpm install bootstrap sass(l.381). The content is plausibly sound; it simply could not be exercised because the sandbox is network-restricted. Not a confirmed content defect β coverage gap only.
5. Building & Testing the Git Init Shell Script β β 23 Β· ran 6/7 recorded (0 passed, 6 failed, 1 reasoned) Β· 5 runnable¶
failedΒ·bash -n scripts/git_init.shβNo such file or directory (exit 127).failedΒ·bash scripts/git_init.sh --headless β¦β same missing-file error; headless mode never exercised.failedΒ· Bats test (l.28-45) βnot ok 1(built bats-core from source sincesudo aptis sandbox-blocked).failedΒ·shellcheck scripts/git_init.shβ shellcheck 0.9.0 was preinstalled but the target file is absent.- Independent host-tree confirmation: I ran
ls scripts/git_init.shon the checked-out repo βNo such file or directory, and nogit*-named script exists underscripts/. This corroborates the engine's clone/git log --all/submodule search. - Body l.113-121 asserts "It ships in the IT-Journey repository β clone it β¦ chmod +x scripts/git_init.sh", which sets the learner up to fail at the very first command.
- Dimensions: commands_work ~0 (overall 23).
π Issues Found¶
- HIGH Β· Building & Testing the Git Init Shell Script Β· core dependency / body l.59, l.113-121, l.127-155 β The entire quest targets
scripts/git_init.sh, which does not exist anywhere in the repo (confirmed by the engine's clone + fullgit log --all+ submodule search, and independently by me vials scripts/git_init.shon the host tree). All 5 runnable snippets fail with exit 127. Fix: inline the full script in the quest, commit it toscripts/git_init.sh, or link a specific commit/gist that contains it; then add a "confirm the script exists and is executable" precondition step. - HIGH Β· Building & Testing the Git Init Shell Script Β· "Get the script first" callout (l.113-114) β The claim "It ships in the IT-Journey repository" is false and is the first thing a learner acts on. Fix: remove or correct the claim once the script actually ships.
- HIGH Β· Technology Stack Analysis: Barodybroject Β· Quick Setup bash block (l.671-673) β The documented
export DB_CHOICE=sqliteno-external-DB path fails; the livesettings.pyhard-rejects SQLite. Fix: document a real no-external-DB path (e.g. a docker-compose local-Postgres profile) or drop the SQLite claim and require Postgres. - MEDIUM Β· Technology Stack Analysis: Barodybroject Β· Security & Quality section (l.538, l.591) β "None identified in current dependency scan" is contradicted by the quest's own
pip-auditrecommendation, which surfaces real CVEs against the pinned versions. Fix: date-stamp the claim to the analysis date or remove it. - MEDIUM Β· Technology Stack Analysis: Barodybroject Β· factual drift (requirements.txt l.380-418, settings/views layout) β Live Django is 5.1.4 (quest shows 4.2.20); django-filer/django-cms family absent from the live repo; workflow/utils/views layout drifted beyond what the top-of-doc disclaimer names. Fix: turn the disclaimer into a guided diff exercise, or refresh the pinned facts.
- LOW Β· Technology Stack Analysis: Barodybroject Β· settings.py excerpts (l.205-236, l.650-658) β Reference undefined
env/IS_PRODUCTIONβNameErrorif run standalone. Fix: label them "# excerpt β add inside settings.py whereenvis defined". - HIGH Β· CSS Styling Basics Β· Ch.3 vs Ch.2
.card-grid(cascade) β Building the stylesheet top-to-bottom as taught, Ch.3's mobile-first.card-grid { grid-template-columns: 1fr }+ media query silently overrides Ch.2'srepeat(auto-fit, minmax(200px,1fr))demo, with no warning. Fix: tell the learner to replace the earlier rule, or rename the demo class. - HIGH Β· CSS Styling Basics Β· Theming
:rootvs Ch.3:root(cascade) β A second:root { --brand }in the Theming section silently overrides Ch.3's--brand. Fix: merge into one:rootblock or rename the variable. - MEDIUM Β· CSS Styling Basics Β· Secondary objective "Specificity" β Named as a secondary objective/knowledge check but never taught. Fix: add a short paragraph on the specificity hierarchy.
- MEDIUM Β· Advanced Markdown Β· Chapter 1 Task Lists (l.241) β "Task lists render as real checkboxes" is stated unconditionally, but this is only true under GFM-mode parsing (GitHub, VS Code preview, or kramdown
input: GFM); vanilla Jekyll/kramdown renders- [ ]literally. Fix: add a one-line caveat. - LOW Β· Advanced Markdown Β· setup snippets β Trailing
code guide.mdsilently fails if the VS CodecodeCLI isn't on PATH. Fix: note the "Install 'code' command in PATH" step. - INFO (not a content bug) Β· Bootstrap Framework Β· engine coverage gap β The quest was not scored because the execute engine exhausted its 40-turn budget retrying CDN/connectivity
curlprobes in the network-restricted sandbox. No content defect is claimed; re-run in a network-enabled sandbox (or add a--allow-domains cdn.jsdelivr.netallowance) to get a real verdict.
π Chain Continuity¶
Reading the five quests in plan order as a single Digital Artist journey:
- Ordering is jarring for this character path. The Digital Artist is a UI/UX learner. Quests 1 (Markdown), 3 (CSS), 4 (Bootstrap) form a coherent front-end arc β but quest 2 (Barodybroject Django stack analysis, a
side_quest) and quest 5 (git_init shell-script testing) drop a beginning designer into a ~1,100-line backend analyst report and a Bash/Bats/shellcheck CI exercise. Neither builds on the CSS/markdown skills the arc otherwise develops. This is an artifact of the date-rotated window (5 of 26, level-wide not path-curated), so it reflects level ordering rather than a hand-built sequence β worth noting for maintainers weighing per-character sequencing. - Prerequisites are honest and self-contained. Quests 1, 3, 4 each declare
required_quests: []and only assume basic file editing / CLI navigation; Bootstrap correctly lists CSS Styling Basics as a recommended (not required) prior quest, and CSSunlocksBootstrap β that pairing is internally consistent and a learner finishing CSS is genuinely ready for Bootstrap. - Two quests break the "leave the learner ready for the next step" contract on their own terms β not because of a missing prior quest, but because the artifacts they depend on are absent/broken: git_init.sh does not exist, and Barodybroject's setup path is rejected by the live app. A learner following either literally hits a wall on the first hands-on command, regardless of what preceded it.
- The strong quests are self-sufficient. Markdown and CSS need nothing from earlier quests and deliver their stated objectives, so the arc's teaching spine is sound; the failures are isolated artifact/drift problems, not a cascading prerequisite gap.
π§ Reasoning & Method¶
- Mode:
execute(sealed). I consumedwalk-plan.json+walk-evidence.json/walk-evidence.mdexactly as the workflow sealed them β I did not re-run the agentic engine (its childclaudeprocesses cannot authenticate from my Bash tool), did not edit the plan or evidence, and did not touch any quest content. - What I ran myself: only read-only corroboration β
ls scripts/git_init.shand a scan ofscripts/on the host tree (confirmed absent), plus reading each of the five quest sources in plan order and grep-checking the specific lines the evidence cites (git-init l.113-121, barodybroject l.671-673 / l.538 / l.591, advanced-markdown l.241, bootstrap CDN l.237-252). No quest commands were executed by me and no files were modified beyond writing this report. - What is
reasonedvstested: everypassed/failedabove is a command the sealed engine actually ran in the sandbox. Cross-OS setup blocks (macOS/Windows) and the mermaid/settings.py excerpts arereasoned. The git_init.sh absence istestedby the engine and independently re-confirmed by me on the host tree. - Coverage & limits:
- 1 of 5 quests (Bootstrap) has no machine verdict β engine
max_turnson network probes. I only reasoned statically about it and explicitly did not assert a content pass/fail. - The sandbox is network-restricted (blocked the Bootstrap CDN and Barodybroject external-DB paths) and
sudo/apt-blocked (bats-core was built from source). These are environment limits, not quest defects, except where a quest's only documented path depends on them (Barodybroject SQLite). - This is a window of 5 of 26 quests for the level (
window 1 of 6); the remaining 21 quests are out of scope for this session and are swept by later runs per the ledger. - Confidence: High on the two blockers (git_init.sh absence independently reproduced; Barodybroject setup failure is a run-real failure). Medium on the CSS cascade bugs (engine-observed, plausible on read, not re-run by me). Bootstrap: no confidence in either direction β genuinely un-evaluated.
- Overall verdict β fail: 3 of 5 quests do not deliver a completable hands-on path in this window (2 confirmed blockers + 1 un-scored), which outweighs the two excellent teaching quests for a learner trying to walk the slice front-to-back.