211 original, openly-licensed multiple-choice practice items across Logical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension, and Logic Games — each with a full explanation — plus 4 Argumentative Writing prompts with a scoring rubric and an annotated model response — 215 items in all. Everything runs in your browser; your progress is stored only on this device.
What this site does not have
Three things in the full Law AI lab need a server, so they are not here: an AI tutor to talk a question through when the written guide is not enough, a blind answer cross-check that re-solves an item independently, and server-side stats and the human review queue used to author new questions. Everything else — the bank, the explanations, the step-by-step solve guides, the writing rubric and model responses, the knowledge library and the concept catalog — is here in full and works offline. The lab itself is open source.
Logical Reasoning
99 items
Two scored sections on the LSAT (~24–26 questions each, 35 minutes per section). Each question presents a short argument or set of facts followed by a single multiple-choice prompt. LR tests the ability to analyze, evaluate, and complete arguments — the core daily work of a lawyer.
One scored section: four passages (one is typically a comparative pair) drawn from law, humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences, followed by 5–8 questions each. Tests close reading, structural mapping, and the ability to distinguish what the author claims from what the author merely reports.
Format
~27 questions across 4 passage sets; 5 answer choices A–E.
Timing
35 minutes total (~8:30 per passage including reading time).
Strategy tips
Read for STRUCTURE first, details second — questions reward knowing where to look.
Pre-phrase the main point before reading the answer choices.
Eliminate extremes for tone questions unless the passage is explicit.
Analytical Reasoning (Logic Games)
52 items
Historically four games per scored section (sequencing, grouping, matching, hybrid). LSAC announced a multi-year phase-out of the dedicated LG section beginning in August 2024 — replaced by an additional Logical Reasoning section on the August 2024 LSAT and beyond. Logic Games remain pedagogically essential: the diagramming skills they develop transfer directly to LR conditional reasoning and to legal exam writing. Practice them.
Format
Each game presents a setup + ~3–6 rules followed by 5–7 questions sharing the same setup; 5 answer choices A–E.
Timing
35 minutes per section (~8:30 per game).
Strategy tips
Spend the first 60–90 seconds turning the rules into a clean visual diagram.
On orientation questions, eliminate one answer per rule.
On 'if'-then questions, build the hypothetical and force every implication before reading the answers.
If you find more than two solutions for a 'must be true' question, you're missing an inference.
Argumentative Writing
4 prompts
A single unscored writing task taken separately from the multiple-choice exam. You are given a debatable issue, the principal positions on it, and several perspectives to reason from; you argue for one position and answer the other. Law schools receive the essay itself, so it is read rather than scored — which makes it the one section where the quality of your prose is seen directly by an admissions reader.
Format
One prompt: an issue, two positions, and three or more supplied perspectives. You produce an essay of your own; there are no answer choices.
Timing
An untimed pre-writing period followed by 35 minutes of writing.
Strategy tips
Spend the pre-writing period picking a position you can defend, not the one you believe.
Write the thesis so a reader could say what would refute it.
Engage at least two supplied perspectives substantively; quoting them back is not engagement.
Put the counterargument second-to-last so the reader leaves with your answer, not the objection.
Bound every concession in the same sentence you make it.